# name
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (2008)

# short_name
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (2008)

# description
Keep Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (2008) On Your Home Screen

# shortcuts[].name
There's nothing to be learned in neurosurgery. by assuming an accidental origin for the parts of the brain that we work on

# shortcuts[].short_name
There's nothing to be learned in neurosurgery. by assuming an accidental origin for the parts of the brain that we work on

# shortcuts[].description
Play There's nothing to be learned in neurosurgery. by assuming an accidental origin for the parts of the brain that we work on

# shortcuts[].name
Hasn't this all been resolved. Aren't we all darwinists now. except for a few cranks like you Well it's a funny thing that questions. that aren't properly answered don't go away This question is loaded with all kinds of political baggage. but one on one at a scientific meeting after the third or fourth beer my experience has been that many evolutionary biologists will say yeah this theory has got a lot of problems

# shortcuts[].short_name
Hasn't this all been resolved. Aren't we all darwinists now. except for a few cranks like you Well it's a funny thing that questions. that aren't properly answered don't go away This question is loaded with all kinds of political baggage. but one on one at a scientific meeting after the third or fourth beer my experience has been that many evolutionary biologists will say yeah this theory has got a lot of problems

# shortcuts[].description
Play Hasn't this all been resolved. Aren't we all darwinists now. except for a few cranks like you Well it's a funny thing that questions. that aren't properly answered don't go away This question is loaded with all kinds of political baggage. but one on one at a scientific meeting after the third or fourth beer my experience has been that many evolutionary biologists will say yeah this theory has got a lot of problems

# shortcuts[].name
Before you can ask is darwinian theory correct or not. you have to ask the preliminary question is it clear enough so that it could be correct That's a very different question. One of my prevailing doctrines about darwinian theory. is man that thing is just a mess It's like looking into a room full of smoke. Nothing in the theory. is precisely clearly carefully defined or delineated It lacks all of the rigor. one expects from Mathematical Physics and Mathematical Physics lacks all the rigor...

# shortcuts[].short_name
Before you can ask is darwinian theory correct or not. you have to ask the preliminary question is it clear enough so that it could be correct That's a very different question. One of my prevailing doctrines about darwinian theory. is man that thing is just a mess It's like looking into a room full of smoke. Nothing in the theory. is precisely clearly carefully defined or delineated It lacks all of the rigor. one expects from Mathematical Physics and Mathematical Physics lacks all the rigor...

# shortcuts[].description
Play Before you can ask is darwinian theory correct or not. you have to ask the preliminary question is it clear enough so that it could be correct That's a very different question. One of my prevailing doctrines about darwinian theory. is man that thing is just a mess It's like looking into a room full of smoke. Nothing in the theory. is precisely clearly carefully defined or delineated It lacks all of the rigor. one expects from Mathematical Physics and Mathematical Physics lacks all the rigor...

# shortcuts[].name
We don't know what caused life to arise. Did it arise by a purely undirected process. or did it arise by some kind of intelligent guidance or design And the rules of science. are being applied to actually foreclose one of the two possible answers to that very fundamental and basic and important question

# shortcuts[].short_name
We don't know what caused life to arise. Did it arise by a purely undirected process. or did it arise by some kind of intelligent guidance or design And the rules of science. are being applied to actually foreclose one of the two possible answers to that very fundamental and basic and important question

# shortcuts[].description
Play We don't know what caused life to arise. Did it arise by a purely undirected process. or did it arise by some kind of intelligent guidance or design And the rules of science. are being applied to actually foreclose one of the two possible answers to that very fundamental and basic and important question

# shortcuts[].name
I'm finally just beginning to grasp. the complexity of the cell Are there systems within the cell. that go well beyond darwinian evolution some type of cellular technology that drives adaptation replication quality control and repair What if these new mechanisms. have massive design implications Well I say so be it.

# shortcuts[].short_name
I'm finally just beginning to grasp. the complexity of the cell Are there systems within the cell. that go well beyond darwinian evolution some type of cellular technology that drives adaptation replication quality control and repair What if these new mechanisms. have massive design implications Well I say so be it.

# shortcuts[].description
Play I'm finally just beginning to grasp. the complexity of the cell Are there systems within the cell. that go well beyond darwinian evolution some type of cellular technology that drives adaptation replication quality control and repair What if these new mechanisms. have massive design implications Well I say so be it.

# shortcuts[].name
Suppose we find simply as a matter of fact. that our scientific inquiries point in one direction Which is that there is an intelligent creator. Why should we eliminate that from discussion. Streng verboten How come Why.

# shortcuts[].short_name
Suppose we find simply as a matter of fact. that our scientific inquiries point in one direction Which is that there is an intelligent creator. Why should we eliminate that from discussion. Streng verboten How come Why.

# shortcuts[].description
Play Suppose we find simply as a matter of fact. that our scientific inquiries point in one direction Which is that there is an intelligent creator. Why should we eliminate that from discussion. Streng verboten How come Why.

# shortcuts[].name
This conflict. over the principles of evolution has become a religious war It really is no longer about scientific investigation.

# shortcuts[].short_name
This conflict. over the principles of evolution has become a religious war It really is no longer about scientific investigation.

# shortcuts[].description
Play This conflict. over the principles of evolution has become a religious war It really is no longer about scientific investigation.

# shortcuts[].name
Richard Dawkins has a charming. and very I think interesting view of the relationship between science and religion They're at war with each other. and in the end one's got to win And it's going to be science. It's a very na ve view. It's based on a complete historical misrepresentation. of the way science and religion have interacted Dawkins seems to think that scientific description. is an anti religious argument Describing how something happens scientifically. somehow explains it away It...

# shortcuts[].short_name
Richard Dawkins has a charming. and very I think interesting view of the relationship between science and religion They're at war with each other. and in the end one's got to win And it's going to be science. It's a very na ve view. It's based on a complete historical misrepresentation. of the way science and religion have interacted Dawkins seems to think that scientific description. is an anti religious argument Describing how something happens scientifically. somehow explains it away It...

# shortcuts[].description
Play Richard Dawkins has a charming. and very I think interesting view of the relationship between science and religion They're at war with each other. and in the end one's got to win And it's going to be science. It's a very na ve view. It's based on a complete historical misrepresentation. of the way science and religion have interacted Dawkins seems to think that scientific description. is an anti religious argument Describing how something happens scientifically. somehow explains it away It...

# shortcuts[].name
I think it was just a catastrophic mistake. to have someone like Dawkins address himself to profound issues of theology the existence of God the nature of life He hasn't committed himself to. disciplined study in any relevant area of inquiry He's a crummy philosopher. He doesn't have the rudimentary skills. to meticulously assess his own arguments

# shortcuts[].short_name
I think it was just a catastrophic mistake. to have someone like Dawkins address himself to profound issues of theology the existence of God the nature of life He hasn't committed himself to. disciplined study in any relevant area of inquiry He's a crummy philosopher. He doesn't have the rudimentary skills. to meticulously assess his own arguments

# shortcuts[].description
Play I think it was just a catastrophic mistake. to have someone like Dawkins address himself to profound issues of theology the existence of God the nature of life He hasn't committed himself to. disciplined study in any relevant area of inquiry He's a crummy philosopher. He doesn't have the rudimentary skills. to meticulously assess his own arguments

# shortcuts[].name
People who tell you. for example that science tells you all you need to know about the world or that science tells you that religion is all wrong or science tells you there is no God those people aren't telling you scientific things They are saying metaphysical things. and they have to defend their positions for metaphysical reasons

# shortcuts[].short_name
People who tell you. for example that science tells you all you need to know about the world or that science tells you that religion is all wrong or science tells you there is no God those people aren't telling you scientific things They are saying metaphysical things. and they have to defend their positions for metaphysical reasons

# shortcuts[].description
Play People who tell you. for example that science tells you all you need to know about the world or that science tells you that religion is all wrong or science tells you there is no God those people aren't telling you scientific things They are saying metaphysical things. and they have to defend their positions for metaphysical reasons